← Chapter 33 | Table of Contents | Chapter 35 →

What Chemistry Discloses About the Structure of Who Is Hurting Whom

“You reach that point when you don’t see this as Jewish or Arabic. There’s nothing — no language, no religion, no gender, nothing.”

— Arab-Palestinian woman, ayahuasca ceremony participant; Roseman et al., Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2021

“I now see myself as part of something bigger. I felt myself connected to what had to be the collective mind — realizing it’s like: Oh, this exists, and we’re all just facets of this.”

— Psilocybin participant; Crowe et al., International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2023

I. A DIFFERENT ROUTE TO THE SAME DISCLOSURE

The preceding essay documented what the dying discover. This essay documents what the living can encounter when chemistry temporarily dissolves the architecture that normally separates the self from the field it moves within. The two routes — biological compulsion and chemical induction — arrive at the same structural disclosure by radically different means. That they arrive at the same place is not coincidental. It is the most important finding in this entire three-part sequence.

The disclosure is this: the self that believed it was acting upon a separate world was mistaken about the nature of its own position. Every act has always been conducted within a WE. The boundary between actor and recipient, between I and the world I act upon, is a construction of the wound’s architecture — not a feature of reality itself. When that architecture is temporarily suspended, either through death or through the specific neurological action of certain compounds, what is disclosed is the field. The seamless, boundless, inexhaustible WE within which every apparently separate act has always been occurring.

In the project’s vocabulary: the chemistry temporarily moves the organism from 2φ — the Known accumulating without the IS-ground in the circuit — to a direct contact with φ° = 1, the ground present as itself, undiluted by the wound’s management. What becomes visible in that contact is not a new truth. It is the structure that was always the case.

II. ENEMIES IN THE SAME ROOM

The most concentrated and structurally precise example in the psychedelic literature of the wound’s architecture becoming visible from the WITHIN it destroys is a 2021 study published in Frontiers in Pharmacology by Leor Roseman, Yiftach Ron, Antwan Saca, Natalie Ginsberg, Lisa Luan, Nadeem Karkabi, Rick Doblin, and Robin Carhart-Harris, of the Centre for Psychedelic Research at Imperial College London.

DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.607529

The study investigated ceremonies in which Palestinian Arabs and Jewish Israelis drank ayahuasca together. Thirty-one participants were interviewed in depth, across five different groups. The study found three categories of relational event occurring during the ceremonies. The first was unity-based connection: the temporary dissolution of national, religious, and ethnic identities into felt shared humanity. The second was recognition-through-difference: moments in which participants encountered the other culture — typically through music or prayer in the other’s language — and experienced what the researchers describe as awe and expansion. The third, and the one most directly relevant to this essay’s structural claim, was what the researchers call conflict-related revelations.

These revelations occurred in nearly half the participants. They were rare within any given participant’s history of ceremony attendance — once or twice across dozens of ceremonies — and were consistently described as among the most transformative events of those participants’ lives. They involved, under the influence of ayahuasca, the direct visionary inhabitation of the other side’s experience. The Other’s history, the Other’s terror, the Other’s grief, arriving not as information but as felt reality — the organism discovering, from the inside, what it had been doing to the organism it called enemy.

One Jewish Israeli man, a veteran of an elite combat unit, describes a vision in which he saw himself conducting a house arrest on a Palestinian family. The vision first showed him the operation from his own perspective — the controlled professional execution of a military order. Then the same event showed itself again, from the inside of the Palestinian family’s living room. He saw himself enter. He saw himself through the family’s eyes. He felt the grandmother’s terror at the door, the children’s instant understanding that their world had just been destroyed, the specific quality of the fear that his masked presence installed in bodies that would carry it for the rest of their lives. In his own words, translated for the study: ‘I looked horrible. In my eyes I look like something from a film about Nazis.’ And then: ‘I hated myself, deeply. I was angry at myself and said, it makes no difference, Israel Palestine, whatever, I can’t believe I did that.’

After the ceremony, he began studying Arabic.

What the ayahuasca disclosed was not information he lacked. He knew, rationally, that the family had suffered. He knew the geopolitical history. He knew the statistics of displacement and trauma and generations of harm. None of this knowledge had reached the place in him where the acting occurred. The ayahuasca reached that place. It placed him inside the consequence of his own action, felt from the inside of the person who received it. The architecture of OVER — I act, they receive, I am separate from what I produce — became visible in the moment it dissolved.

The architecture of OVER becomes visible in the moment it dissolves. The separate self is disclosed to itself as the agent of a wound it could not see from the position of the wound’s agent.

This is not a failure of the man’s character. It is a feature of the wound’s architecture. The wound requires separation. The separate self cannot feel what it does to others because feeling it would dissolve the very boundary that makes the separate self’s operations possible. The ayahuasca dissolved the boundary. What became visible in the dissolving was what had always been true: there was never a boundary. The action and its reception have always been one event.

III. WHAT EGO DISSOLUTION ACTUALLY DISSOLVES

The psychedelic research literature uses the term ego dissolution to name the acute experiential state in which the habitual boundaries between self and world temporarily cease to operate. What dissolves is not the organism’s awareness. Awareness remains — and in many accounts, becomes more vivid, more precise, more present than in ordinary consciousness. What dissolves is the overlay the wound installed: the architecture of defended separation, the continuous management-work of maintaining the boundary between I and everything that is not-I.

In the project’s language, what dissolves is the weaving. The organism’s ceaseless production of the Known — the accumulated record of what-has-worked-before, projected continuously onto the present moment to prevent genuine encounter with what-is — temporarily stops. And when it stops, what is disclosed is not darkness and not void. What is disclosed is the field.

A 2023 qualitative meta-synthesis of psilocybin treatment experiences, published in the International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, documents a participant describing this disclosure in precisely the terms the project has been using: ‘I felt myself connected to what had to be the collective mind — realizing it is like: this exists, and we are all just facets of this. It is me connected to a wider sense of life or consciousness. And it is, like, I know that rationally, but it was a time to feel it in a very real sense and experience it as real.’

Crowe et al., International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2023 · DOI: 10.1111/inm.13127

I know that rationally, but it was a time to feel it in a very real sense. This sentence draws the precise distinction the project has been navigating since its first page. The Known — the accumulated rational understanding that everything is connected — is not the same as the direct contact with the field that is everything’s actual ground. The Known is a representation of what the field is. Contact with the field is the field itself, experienced from the inside. The psychedelic experience, at its depth, is the temporary restoration of that contact — the organism returned, briefly, to the position it occupies before the weaving starts.

The same meta-synthesis documents the relational consequence of this contact: the experience enabled participants to recognize how their behaviours could affect others — including one participant who, having felt themselves as part of the connected whole, could no longer see smoking as a private act. The smallest daily act is re-perceived as an act within the WE. Nothing is private. Nothing is without consequence in the field. This is not a moral instruction imposed from outside. It is structural recognition from inside: the actor and the recipient have always been within the same field. The IS-ground was never divided.

IV. WHAT THIS IS NOT

The psychedelic research carries a critique within itself that must be named honestly, because the project’s argument depends on it being named. The 2021 Palestinian-Israeli study explicitly warns against the over-emphasis on inner spirituality in psychedelic and New Age contexts: the tendency to use the experience of unity for individual transformation while leaving the structural conditions that produce the wound unchanged. A spirituality that produces peak experiences without changing the relational architecture through which harm is conducted is, in the study’s own language, a form of spiritual narcissism — the accumulation of profound inner states that leave the world as it was.

This critique lands with full force. The Israeli soldier who wept in a ceremony and felt the Palestinian family’s terror may still have gone back to his post the following week. The experience of unity does not automatically produce the structural changes that would make unity the operating condition of a society. The bypass — the substitution of a felt sense of connection for the actual relational and political work of building connection — is a genuine risk.

The project acknowledges this risk because its entire argument depends on the distinction between the DOES-level arrival and the merely CAN-level encounter. The psychedelic and NDE experiences described here are CAN-level events: genuine encounters with the structure of reality, real contact with the field, actual dissolving of the wound’s architecture in the moment of the experience. But the DOES-level consequence — the specific, irreversible, received change in how the organism moves in the world — requires something more than the experience itself. It requires integration.

The soldier who began studying Arabic afterward: that is integration. The one who returned to the next ceremony looking for the next peak experience without changing anything: that is the bypass. The NDE experiencer who returned from the life review and began building a veterans’ outreach center: that is integration. The one who spent the rest of their life talking about the light without doing anything differently: that is the bypass. The experience is necessary but not sufficient. The DOES-level consequence is the only test that counts.

V. THE STRUCTURE BEHIND THE SCIENCE

What the psychedelic research confirms, across thousands of accounts gathered under controlled conditions on multiple continents, is that the project’s central structural claim is experientially accessible. The weaving can stop. The field can be disclosed. The WE beneath the I can be felt — directly, immediately, without prior belief or theological preparation — by organisms whose ordinary condition is the defended separation the wound installs.

The Palestinian who sang in Arabic and watched Jewish participants weep and open was not expecting to produce that effect. The Jewish soldier who found himself inside his own raid from the position of the family he was raiding was not seeking that experience. The psilocybin participant who felt themselves connected to the collective mind and recognized for the first time, in felt reality rather than rational understanding, that everything is a single field — that person was not searching for an ontological proof.

They were searching for relief. They were in pain. They had come to the ceremony or the trial or the clinic because ordinary consciousness had failed to give them what they needed. And what they encountered, in the suspension of ordinary consciousness’s weaving-work, was not relief in the sense of the pain being taken away. What they encountered was the ground beneath the pain — the inexhaustible IS that the wound had been obscuring since the day the wound was installed. Not the absence of suffering but the presence of what suffering could not reach.

This is what the dying find. This is what the psychedelic experience discloses. The same territory. The same recognition. The same astonishment at something that feels, unmistakably, like home.

← Chapter 33 | Table of Contents | Chapter 35 →